Lawsuit filed after Lubbock officer-involved shooting seeking $2 - KCBD NewsChannel 11 Lubbock

Lawsuit filed after Lubbock officer-involved shooting seeking $20 million

Paul Valderas Files Lawsuit (Source: KCBD) Paul Valderas Files Lawsuit (Source: KCBD)
Lawsuit Filed After Officer-Involved Shooting (Source: KCBD) Lawsuit Filed After Officer-Involved Shooting (Source: KCBD)
LUBBOCK, TX (KCBD) -

Paul Valderas, a man shot in January by a Lubbock police officer, has filed a lawsuit against that officer and the City of Lubbock.

The $20 million federal civil rights suit was filed October 25, claiming the shooting was unjustified and accused the officer of excessive force.

On Jan. 26, 2017, according to the Lubbock Police Department, 31-year-old Valderas was shot in the 3300 block of Grinnell Street when narcotics officers were attempting to serve Valderas a parole violation warrant after several weeks of investigation.

The arrest warrant states Valderas was driving a vehicle in the 5700 block of Quaker Ave on Jan. 8, 2017 and crashed into a signal light pole. Police learned four days later two ounces of meth and a gun were found in the same vehicle at Lubbock Wrecker Service. Employees at the Lubbock Wrecker Service told police several people called about the vehicle and asked the employees to tell other people who called that the vehicle wasn't at their facility.

The next day, a K9 Officer found 57.70 grams of a white crystal-like substance, a digital scale and a cell phone inside the vehicle.

After the shooting, Chief Greg Stevens hosted a news conference in which he said Valderas was known to be "never without a firearm" and LPD said Valderas was part of a violent gang.

After spotting Valderas and following him to Grinnell, police say he exited the home and was talking to some people in a vehicle outside when police approached wearing tactical gear that identified them as police.

LPD said they shouted "Police!" and began giving commands.

"Unfortunately, Mr. Valderas quickly drew a firearm from under his shirt, from his waistband, pulled that firearm out and one of the officers who was attempting to take him into custody clearly had no alternative but to shoot Mr. Valderas," Chief Stevens said at that Jan. 27 news conference. 

The lawsuit says otherwise, pointing to a surveillance video from a nearby home.

"The audio and video showed Mitchell [the officer] did not properly identify himself as a police officer. When Mr. Valderas realized Mitchell was a cop, Mr. Valderas very clearly disarmed himself by placing the gun in a nearby vehicle--inaccessible to his person," according to the suit. "Yet, Mitchell still shot and continued shooting without giving a single command."

Both sides agree five shots were fired but police say only three hit Valderas in the "upper torso area." The suit claims the other two hit him as well, with some of the shots hitting him in the back as he ran for safety permanently paralyzing Valderas from the chest down. 

The suit claims the officer lied in his statement about Valderas being armed. Valderas' attorney, Daniel A. Dailey told KCBD NewsChannel 11 the most important part of the lawsuit is recognizing the officers who did not say Valderas was armed in their statements.

"We hope that from this lawsuit, yes justice will be obtained for Mr. Valderas, but we really do hope that the officers who told the truth, who are honest and continue to be honest are acknowledged and they are not ignored and they have some encouragement to continue to be honest," Dailey said. 

Court documents show Valderas has been indicted for Felon in Possession of a Firearm for having a weapon on Jan. 26 and after he was convicted of Possession of a Controlled Substance in 2009.

KCBD reached out to the Lubbock Police Department Thursday and was told, "We do not comment on pending litigation."

RELATED STORY: Police: 'Armed and dangerous' gang member in critical condition after officer-involved shooting

Copyright 2017 KCBD. All rights reserved.

  • Local News on KCBD.comNewsMore>>

  • Referendum in Ireland could lift strict ban on abortion

    Referendum in Ireland could lift strict ban on abortion

    Friday, May 25 2018 2:32 AM EDT2018-05-25 06:32:46 GMT
    Friday, May 25 2018 12:56 PM EDT2018-05-25 16:56:53 GMT
    (Clodagh Kilcoyne/PA via AP). Presiding officer Carmel McBride looks on as a woman casts her vote in the referendum on the 8th Amendment of the Irish Constitution, on Thursday May 24, 2018, a day early for the people that live off the coast of Donegal ...(Clodagh Kilcoyne/PA via AP). Presiding officer Carmel McBride looks on as a woman casts her vote in the referendum on the 8th Amendment of the Irish Constitution, on Thursday May 24, 2018, a day early for the people that live off the coast of Donegal ...

    Voters throughout Ireland have begun casting votes in a referendum that may lead to a loosening of the country's strict ban on most abortions.

    Voters throughout Ireland have begun casting votes in a referendum that may lead to a loosening of the country's strict ban on most abortions.

  • Explosion at Indian restaurant in Canada wounds 15 people

    Explosion at Indian restaurant in Canada wounds 15 people

    Friday, May 25 2018 2:42 AM EDT2018-05-25 06:42:29 GMT
    Friday, May 25 2018 12:55 PM EDT2018-05-25 16:55:57 GMT
    Canadian police say an explosion set off deliberately in a restaurant has wounded at least 15 people, some of them critically. (Source: CTV Network via CNN)Canadian police say an explosion set off deliberately in a restaurant has wounded at least 15 people, some of them critically. (Source: CTV Network via CNN)

    Canadian police say an explosion set off deliberately in a restaurant has wounded at least 15 people, some of them critically.

    Canadian police say an explosion set off deliberately in a restaurant has wounded at least 15 people, some of them critically.

  • Trump balks at North Korea's rhetoric but it has used worse

    Trump balks at North Korea's rhetoric but it has used worse

    Friday, May 25 2018 2:22 AM EDT2018-05-25 06:22:51 GMT
    Friday, May 25 2018 12:55 PM EDT2018-05-25 16:55:52 GMT
    A federal judge in New York says President Donald Trump cannot block his critics on Twitter without violating the First Amendment. (Source: CNN)A federal judge in New York says President Donald Trump cannot block his critics on Twitter without violating the First Amendment. (Source: CNN)

    North Korea language was milder than its typical inflammatory, harsh rhetoric but enough for Trump to kill summit.

    North Korea language was milder than its typical inflammatory, harsh rhetoric but enough for Trump to kill summit.

Powered by Frankly